What was chloe saying?

[Mog-el]

When she was save clark from that alien plant. Thunderstroms was passing through my area and my lights was flickering on and off.

Omg clark ................

[future-reporter]

okay she used this device and he escaped and she said
electricity kills the enzymes
or somethin scientific

[Tacosupes]

And why the hell did she tell LAna to go screw Lex? She pretty much said it was a bad idea, but"hey do it anyway!!"

I think she just wants to push lana off the bridge of ever returning to Clark. Oh well , it was the best episode this season, i liked the continuity of the Phantom Zone escapees. They worked them into the show way better than season 4 did the 3 gems of power BS.

[D.M.A.]

Originally posted by Tacosupes
And why the hell did she tell LAna to go screw Lex? She pretty much said it was a bad idea, but"hey do it anyway!!"

I think she just wants to push lana off the bridge of ever returning to Clark. Oh well , it was the best episode this season, i liked the continuity of the Phantom Zone escapees. They worked them into the show way better than season 4 did the 3 gems of power BS.
well she didn't really say do it,she was jus tellin her that if she has doubts now that they may never go away.Imo she was tryin to tell lana that she still has options and not to allow herself to be pressured into doin it.Plus lana kept sayin how she trusted the wrong ppl or got too close and it bein too late(Referrin to clark obviously),I think chloe was only givin her the best advice she could.Which was if lana feels it is right and can live wit the consequences of bein wit lex than what does it matter.And yea ur right so far we've gotten 3 episodes wit continuity,but we'll see for how long lol.I'm actually suprise they mention Zod again tonight,I thought they would have been dropped it and never mention him again so that's a plus.Tho the episode wasn't great it wasn't bad,jus a few parts felt rushed.

[khufu]

Originally posted by Mog-el
When she was save clark from that alien plant. Thunderstroms was passing through my area and my lights was flickering on and off.

Omg clark ................ After she shocked the plant? I think she said "I can't loose you twice"... which is interesting because it emphasizes that she still does have feelings for him.

[ginnyfan]

^What is Lana a wind up doll! If someone told you to have sex with someone would you do it! LOL!

Anyway... Chloe did not tell Lana to have sex with Lex! She told her as far as guys go Lex wouldn't even be on her LIST!!! Then, putting her own feelings aside she told Lana not to stay paralysed by fear but to jump in and live life. If that translates into moving on to the next step with Lex... well... that's not Chloe's fault. LOL!

[RobynAdele0406]

Originally posted by ginnyfan
^What is Lana a wind up doll! If someone told you to have sex with someone would you do it! LOL!

Anyway... Chloe did not tell Lana to have sex with Lex! She told her as far as guys go Lex wouldn't even be on her LIST!!! Then, putting her own feelings aside she told Lana not to stay paralysed by fear but to jump in and live life. If that translates into moving on to the next step with Lex... well... that's not Chloe's fault. LOL!

*bows down* Exactly. I think people forget that Lana's a big girl and can make her own decisions. Crazy concept, I know! :lol:

[Mog-el]

Originally posted by khufu
After she shocked the plant? I think she said "I can't loose you twice"... which is interesting because it emphasizes that she still does have feelings for him.

That the qoute I was trying to make out in the scene when clark fell to the ground and she was shaking clark like crazy thanks.

[D.M.A.]

Originally posted by khufu
After she shocked the plant? I think she said "I can't loose you twice"... which is interesting because it emphasizes that she still does have feelings for him.
khufu u be on it,cause i swear I saw the scene and didn't hear it myself smh.I have to see it again(Maybe on youtube where I can jus replay it)and catch the things I missed cause I definitely missed that line and was watchin that moment smh

Originally posted by ginnyfan
^What is Lana a wind up doll! If someone told you to have sex with someone would you do it! LOL!

Anyway... Chloe did not tell Lana to have sex with Lex! She told her as far as guys go Lex wouldn't even be on her LIST!!! Then, putting her own feelings aside she told Lana not to stay paralysed by fear but to jump in and live life. If that translates into moving on to the next step with Lex... well... that's not Chloe's fault. LOL!
Agree she wasn't tellin her too,but to do what she feels is best cause if she has worries now they she may still have them later.But if she was basically jus sayin take a chance but make sure u can live wit it,and that its ok to make mistakes.But she didn't give off the impression to sleep wit him,espcially since lana was only talkin about gettin close nothin about sleepin together.That was all lana there

[Billy Jor-El]

Lana looked liked a pathetic, lost loser, while Chloe looked so much in control. I give her credit for given her heart felt advice even if Lana ends up losing her identity with Lex. Lana needs to live her own choices, trust herself more than anyone, etc etc etc.

And I did not hear the "lose you twice" comment! Yow! Gotta watch this one again (thankfully I now live inthe world of DVR ;) )

Yeah, Chloe still has feelings for Clark, I haven't decided if she's messing with JO just to get CK jealous.

[future-reporter]

Lana is a big girl she doesnt need to be treated like a baby she should make her own mistakes, not that sleeping with lex would be a mistake (for anyone)

[lastdaughterofkrypton]

Why is Chloe responsable of saving Lana from herself?! it puzzles me.
Somehow Chloe should tie up Lana to a chair and not let her go till she promise no to feel atracted to Lex and to stop living with him since you know poor Lana's only skill is to do her hair :p

[Liriel]

Firstly - I still don't understand why Chloe and Clark don't tell Lana about some of Lex's evil deeds. Particularly the part about Cyborg - she already knows everything but the "who."

Now about this scene - I thought Chloe was projecting. All that about not sitting on the shore of faithfulness (or something) and getting fins and playing in the water made me think of Chloe pursuing a relationship with Jimmy instead of waiting on Clark. And, I mean, Chloe already knows Clark isn't going to come through for Lana - that he's not willing to tell her the truth.

[jwoodie]

Well, after some reflection on the Chloe/Lana scene, I think it was way off the mark in the end. Most of that scene had me and probably most fans nodding our heads in agreement. It was definitely a epiphany moment for Lana, as she said some things to Chloe about herself that most people have recognized about her for a long while. In that way, it was a very interesting scene, and an important one for her character. Or at least it could have been – should have been – if only it had ended in some conceivably rational way. But frankly, it just didn’t. First off, this conversation is between Lana and Chloe – that right there is almost absurd after the past year they’ve had. Lana and Lois, maybe, after the couple of girl-talk heart-to-heart conversations they’ve had. But Lana opening up in this way to Chloe, at this time? Um, no. So that seemed strange from the beginning. But ok, it was all going well and Chloe was listening and being a good friend – and then she not only dropped the ball, but she nicely handed the ball the opposing player and stepped out of the way with a wave and a smile while the opposing player scored. Game over. Worse. Advice. Ever. Never in the history of girl-talk has there ever been such poorly conceived and/or executed advice transmitted between two human females. This was THE scene whose absence I’ve been complaining about for months now. Months, I tell you! And finally the day of Lana’s Fork in the Road on her personal journey, she arrives at Chloe’s door, and Chloe happily hands her the basket of muffins and sends her off into the black forrest where the Big Bad Wolf was peeking from behind the branches of the evil-looking tree with the huge knot-eyes, as vultures hovered overhead to the sounds of a swelling, ominous orchestral finale. Unbelievable!

So, too harsh? Ok, maybe. But a scene like that isn’t just a missed opportunity, its just another in a series of deliberately obtuse and frankly ridiculous scenarios to put Lana through, with the sole aim of putting her squarely into Lex’s arms for good.

I know no one is responsible for Lana except herself, but for the past year and a half, TPTB have gone to unbelievable lengths to shelter Lana from everything to keep her woefully in the dark. So I don't think its unreasonable, given the huge gulf of understanding between what Chloe knows and what Lana knows, to expect that Chloe would *at least* lay out a few facts for her so Lana could come to a reasonably informed decision. There are at least a half-dozen whoppers she could tell Lana without revealing Clark's secret, ie. the torturing of Victor Stone in the same episode that Lana was defending Lex. What does Chloe have to lose at that point? As Lana sinks in deeper with Lex, their friendship will become more and more distant so she's going to lose a friend if she *doesn't* come clean to her, so what else does she have to lose by trying to set the record straight for Lana. And Lana is clearly struggling with this decision, and from her conversation with Lex, its Lex's past that is troubling her - *as it should*! And that's only the tiniest fraction of stuff she actually knows about. Chloe could have easily rounded out that picture, cemented those perfectly valid concerns and put the kabosh on the whole thing. But of course, that didn't square with the long-term goal of putting Lana together with Lex, come hell or high water, so we get this unbelievably lame and irrational non-advice from Chloe, who as the most level-headed member of the SV squad was in the best position to set things straight. What a shame.

The comment about Chloe projecting was probably exactly right, though I didn't see it that way on first viewing. But that was probably because of the blood running into my eyes from the hair I was yanking out by the roots, so it's probably just me. Seems like a very good likelihood that Chloe's advice had more to do with her and Jimmy than Lana and Lex. Doesn't really change any of the above for me, though.

[Usaghy_7]

Originally posted by jwoodie
Well, after some reflection on the Chloe/Lana scene, I think it was way off the mark in the end. Most of that scene had me and probably most fans nodding our heads in agreement. It was definitely a epiphany moment for Lana, as she said some things to Chloe about herself that most people have recognized about her for a long while. In that way, it was a very interesting scene, and an important one for her character. Or at least it could have been – should have been – if only it had ended in some conceivably rational way. But frankly, it just didn’t. First off, this conversation is between Lana and Chloe – that right there is almost absurd after the past year they’ve had. Lana and Lois, maybe, after the couple of girl-talk heart-to-heart conversations they’ve had. But Lana opening up in this way to Chloe, at this time? Um, no. So that seemed strange from the beginning. months now. Months, I tell you! And finally the day of Lana’s Fork in the Road on her personal journey, she arrives at Chloe’s door, and Chloe happily hands her the basket of muffins and sends her off into the black forrest where the Big Bad Wolf was peeking from behind the branches of the evil-looking tree with the huge knot-eyes, as vultures hovered overhead to the sounds of a swelling, ominous orchestral finale. Unbelievable!.....
So I don't think its unreasonable, given the huge gulf of understanding between what Chloe knows and what Lana knows, to expect that Chloe would *at least* lay out a few facts for her so Lana could come to a reasonably informed decision. There are at least a half-dozen whoppers she could tell Lana without revealing Clark's secret, ie. the torturing of Victor Stone in ....

... Seems like a very good likelihood that Chloe's advice had more to do with her and Jimmy than Lana and Lex. Doesn't really change any of the above for me, though.

I like the points taht you made - sorry that I took a lot of it out. Yes I was a taken aback that Lana went to Chloe to talk about her concerns about starting a relationship or moving forward in her relationship with Lex but when you really think about it who else could she have gone to. I mean prior to whole Lex/Zod thing Chloe and Lana had been pretty close, their disgreement was more along the line of Clark. Lana was presenting her shortcomings and in a way asking for atonement for how she had treated Chloe the last few months - she didn't just show up, she felt like she needed to bring something with her just in case Chloe didnt' want to talk to her ( hence library book!!)

As for the advice that Chloe gave, I felt that she was projecting a little about living life and telling Lana that Lex would never be on the list of people that she would like but knowing Lana, do you really think that Chloe presenting facts against someone that Lana had feeling for ( mixed but there anyway) would be the best was to salvage whatever they had together...lets think about what we do know about this ...the last time someone warned Lana about Lex ..She denied the relationship ...and than we saw her kissing him!!! so all those facts would have done is throw her even more into his arms. She told her that she couldn't live in fear of the consequences of her actions, that she had to live and in no way did she tell her to be with Lex but at the same time did not tell not to be with him... She was being a friend that didn't want to push Lana into Lex arms even more by telling her to dump him. But it backfired and she decided to sleep with him. I think she did a decent job with the circumstences

FYI : If you have a friend who is dating someone you don't like or you don't think is right for them, the more you show/ or are loud about the opposition the least chances you have of your friend seing their partners shortcomings , they are too busy deflecting you to notice how bad the other person is.

[chlarkfan333]

"I can't lose you twice in one month" is what she says according to the closed captions. So that means one month has elapsed between Zod and Wither.

[Rhoda123]

First off, Chloe and Lana are friends, yes but it isn't up to Chloe to tell Lana what to do.. Lana is a big girl and its time for her to put her big girl panties on and deal with her own life. She didn't have to go for it with Lex but she did. Noone forced her.. she'll have to deal with the consequences whatever they are..

[Liriel]

I still say that, as friends, both Chloe and Clark were obligated to tell Lana about what Lex did in Cyborg once they knew Lana was starting having any kind of relationship (personal or professional) with Lex.

[Rhoda123]

Originally posted by Liriel
I still say that, as friends, both Chloe and Clark were obligated to tell Lana about what Lex did in Cyborg once they knew Lana was starting having any kind of relationship (personal or professional) with Lex.

Honestly, do you think Lana would have listened? I don't!!!!

[Liriel]

Originally posted by Rhoda123
Honestly, do you think Lana would have listened? I don't!!!! I don't know if she would have. But, as friends, I think they were obligated to tell her.

[chlarkfan333]

Originally posted by Liriel
I still say that, as friends, both Chloe and Clark were obligated to tell Lana about what Lex did in Cyborg once they knew Lana was starting having any kind of relationship (personal or professional) with Lex.

I have mixed feelings about this. Being a friend doesn't necessarily obligate one to interfere in that friend's life. True, one could make the argument that if you cared about your friend, you would try to help irrespective of the consequences. In my opinion, there's no right way. Chloe and Clark have tried to warn Lana about Lex and come on, Lana herself knows Lex isn't the stereotypical good guy.

This seems to be recurring theme among posts - blaming other characters for one characters actions when the only person who should be blamed/applauded is the character whose actions are in question. It's called taking responsibility for one's actions.

[Liriel]

Being a friend doesn't necessarily obligate one to interfere in that friend's life. But it does obligate you to tell a friend that the person they are dating in committing horrific criminal acts, especially given what Lana already knew of Victor and what was done to him. If Lana chose to get involved after then so be it. I just can't see any way that a good friend can not tell, when they haven't already made some promise to someone else to keep it.

I just can't see how a person can know that a friend is getting involved with someone who is a killer or a torturer or a rapist or whatever and then not tell that friend.

I blame Lex for Lex's actions, and Lana for Lana's. And Clark and Chloe for theirs. They did not try to tell her how dangerous the person she was getting involved with was, and then Chloe even kind of encouraged Lana to go for it.

[chlarkfan333]

Originally posted by Liriel
But it does obligate you to tell a friend that the person they are dating in committing horrific criminal acts, especially given what Lana already knew of Victor and what was done to him. If Lana chose to get involved after then so be it. I just can't see any way that a good friend can not tell, when they haven't already made some promise to someone else to keep it.

I just can't see how a person can know that a friend is getting involved with someone who is a killer or a torturer or a rapist or whatever and then not tell that friend.

I blame Lex for Lex's actions, and Lana for Lana's. And Clark and Chloe for theirs. They did not try to tell her how dangerous the person she was getting involved with was, and then Chloe even kind of encouraged Lana to go for it.

There was time I would have agreed with you 100%. :) My friends and I have the kind of relationship wherein we're always giving opinions on each others' lives (wanted or not. :p ).

Fact of the matter is, it's a judgement call. Like I said I don't think one is obligated just b/c one is a friend, but it would be something a friend does. Does that make my point clearer?

[jwoodie]

I can *sort of* understand the mentality of not wanting to get involved in other people's business here. If the issue is whether Lex was seeing someone else on the side, say Chloe saw him out for a night on the town with some other girl. Contrived and cliche, I know, but if that was the case, then it's a judgement call. Get involved, don't get involved, could go either way. I'd still come down the side of letting Lana know.

But that's not what we're talking about. It's not about the number of notches on Lex's bedpost, this is *literally* about the bodycount that Lex has racked up over the past couple of seasons, and Chloe's concern should be about not letting her friend become another of *those* notches. Not that Lex would harm Lana - I mean I wouldn't put it past him, but he does seem to genuinely have deep feelings for her and has for some time - but just being around Lex is inherently dangerous. This is where the "personal responsibility" crowd would start in about Lana being a big girl and how she has already been in enough of those situations to know what's she's up against with Lex. To some degree, I agree with that, and that argument gets more convincing all the time so far this season. But the problem is that literally ALL of those situations have painted Lex as the victim, so Lana abandoning him over any one of those would seem just wrong to her. But if she really knew what he was about, she might have a chance to see that he is NOT the victim, that his nefarious activities naturally bring about these situations, and that he's not about to suppress his ambitions just to keep her safe. Plus the other stuff he does, where he is the one leaving a trail of victims, she has NO clue about. That utter ignorance, forced as it is at this point, is the only reason I still give her the benefit of the doubt, and why I fault Chloe in this instance for not addressing that. Chloe actually said last season that Lana has no idea what Lex is about, and she had her chance here to change that, and didn't do it.

[Liriel]

Originally posted by chlarkfan333
Fact of the matter is, it's a judgement call. Like I said I don't think one is obligated just b/c one is a friend, but it would be something a friend does. Does that make my point clearer? I get your point. I just don't agree. It's just too big a bad thing to be a judgement call to me. It's not like they know he cheated on his last girlfriend. They know he's kidnapped and tortured people and done unethical experiments on unwilling individuals.

I guess it's just a matter of opinion.

[mikeghost]

Originally posted by Mog-el
When she was save clark from that alien plant. Thunderstroms was passing through my area and my lights was flickering on and off.

Omg clark ................

To answer your question. After Chloe finished saving Clark from the alien plant and he collapse to the ground. She knelt down next to him and said, 'This girl can loose you twice in this life (or life time)."

[chlarkfan333]

Originally posted by Liriel
I get your point. I just don't agree. It's just too big a bad thing to be a judgement call to me. It's not like they know he cheated on his last girlfriend. They know he's kidnapped and tortured people and done unethical experiments on unwilling individuals.

I guess it's just a matter of opinion.

That's cool. :)

However, recall that Chloe did try to warn Lex off and Lana got pissed for her interference. It may be the reason Chloe kept her mouth shut about Lex's evil dealings. *Shrugs*

[mikeghost]

Originally posted by chlarkfan333
"I can't lose you twice in one month" is what she says according to the closed captions. So that means one month has elapsed between Zod and Wither.

Thank you for clearing that up. :)

[Mog-el]

Thanks khufu,chlarkfan333 and mikeghost. :)

[chlarkfan333]

You are most welcome :)

[AM4lois]

I actually think it is:

"Come on, Clark. Come back! This girl can't loose you twice in one month". (She clearly still has feelings for him... :D)

But the part that is puzzling me is what he says next. I got this from what he said, but I'm not sure:

"I will be in a second"

Is this right? Can anyone confirm this for me? I'm waiting for portuguese subtitles to make sure, since I have no way of getting the english closed caption. Thanks in advance!

[D.M.A.]

Originally posted by AM4lois
I actually think it is:

"Come on, Clark. Come back! This girl can't loose you twice in one month". (She clearly still has feelings for him... :D)

But the part that is puzzling me is what he says next. I got this from what he said, but I'm not sure:

"I will be in a second"

Is this right? Can anyone confirm this for me? I'm waiting for portuguese subtitles to make sure, since I have no way of getting the english closed caption. Thanks in advance!
only saw it once when it aired,but if he did say that then ur right that is puzzlin

[chlarkfan333]

Yeah, he does say I will be in a second but I think that's in response to another question on her part (before she says the bit about losing him). Will have to check it out again.

[AM4lois]

^Weird, isn't it? I think that scene had an extra line or a different line from Chloe that was cut from the final editing... Is just too weird... I think she said something like: "Are you okay?" and he said: "I will be in a second". What puzzles me is that maybe they cut that line and added her previous line latter on as a voice-over like I heard some people say? I don't know, but everytime I watch it, I have a huge frown in my face :confused:

[jwoodie]

This is what I have from my transcript (from the closed captioned source):

Chloe: Come on. Come back. I can't lose you twice in one month.
Clark: [ Groaning ]
Chloe: Are you okay?
Clark: I will be in a second. How'd you kill it?

[D.M.A.]

Originally posted by AM4lois
^Weird, isn't it? I think that scene had an extra line or a different line from Chloe that was cut from the final editing... Is just too weird... I think she said something like: "Are you okay?" and he said: "I will be in a second". What puzzles me is that maybe they cut that line and added her previous line latter on as a voice-over like I heard some people say? I don't know, but everytime I watch it, I have a huge frown in my face :confused:
maybe there was another line cut out cause it didn't quite make sense to me,but then again sv has had alot of slipup jus in 3 episodes.U can tell the edit is fallen off cause I never remember the show havin this many slipups back to back like this.

[AM4lois]

Me neither... I usually am the first to spot weird stuff like this:

*first it was "Zod" and Clark's weird turn in the final scene with Martha. The editing in that scene was awfull! You could tell that the camera moved between takes. Usually, the camera goes with the caracther when they're turning, but that just killed the scene to me. Clark is saying something while the camera is in his right, then he says something again and the camera bruscally goes to his left. Martha wasn't saying anything between. Was just totally weird!!

*Oh, and the papers in Chloe's hands when they hug (where did that come from??)

*Sneeze was sloopy and all over the place like I heard some people that are filming majors say. I tought it was okay, no mistakes so apparent but the editing could have been SO much better.

What's going on? Are the editing people on a strike and TPTB have to edit the scenes themselves? :confused:

[D.M.A.]

Originally posted by AM4lois
Me neither... I usually am the first to spot weird stuff like this:

*first it was "Zod" and Clark's weird turn in the final scene with Martha. The editing in that scene was awfull! You could tell that the camera moved between takes. Usually, the camera goes with the caracther when they're turning, but that just killed the scene to me. Clark is saying something while the camera is in his right, then he says something again and the camera bruscally goes to his left. Martha wasn't saying anything between. Was just totally weird!!

*Oh, and the papers in Chloe's hands when they hug (where did that come from??)

*Sneeze was sloopy and all over the place like I heard some people that are filming majors say. I tought it was okay, no mistakes so apparent but the editing could have been SO much better.

What's going on? Are the editing people on a strike and TPTB have to edit the scenes themselves? :confused:
haha maybe AlMiles doin it all :lol: ,but naw there has been alot of slips tho.More than usual so hopefully they get better within the next few episodes

[Billy Jor-El]

Originally posted by chlarkfan333
"I can't lose you twice in one month" is what she says according to the closed captions. So that means one month has elapsed between Zod and Wither.

I watched it again last night adn re-ran the scene a few times. Well, to my ears it sounded like, "...this girl can't lose you twice in one night." If the captions said "month" that makes more sense; maybe Allison actually blew the line and no one caught it?

As far as "I will be in a second," I thought Chloe asked if he was alright, hence that response. Gee, you're just forcing me to watch it AGAIN :)

[AM4lois]

Actually I'm saying "month". Don't know about the captions. But I swear, I watched it about ten times and it still sounds "month" to my ears... Can you believe that in the captions I got they translated to portuguese as: "This girl can't lose you to this demon"? I HATE subtitles done wrong... I have to keep fixing everything they do, all the time because of my family who doesn't understand a word in english... ;) My problem with all of this is that I didn't hear Chloe asking if he was okay, I think it got cut out of the final editing... Why? No clue... Editing problems...

[Rhoda123]

Originally posted by chlarkfan333
That's cool. :)

However, recall that Chloe did try to warn Lex off and Lana got pissed for her interference. It may be the reason Chloe kept her mouth shut about Lex's evil dealings. *Shrugs*

Exactly! She has tried to warn Lana before and Lana being Lana wouldn't listen..

[D.M.A.]

Originally posted by AM4lois
Actually I'm saying "month". Don't know about the captions. But I swear, I watched it about ten times and it still sounds "month" to my ears... Can you believe that in the captions I got they translated to portuguese as: "This girl can't lose you to this demon"? I HATE subtitles done wrong... I have to keep fixing everything they do, all the time because of my family who doesn't understand a word in english... ;) My problem with all of this is that I didn't hear Chloe asking if he was okay, I think it got cut out of the final editing... Why? No clue... Editing problems...
it probably was,jus like we see her look down at clark before he actually falls.I notice that part(See I was payin attention to sumthin that night :D )and u see her look down first then we see clark fall.So yea that scene had a few edittin probs.But what I dont get is a slip up here or there cool,but it seems like this episode as awhole was rushed to make the air.Cause there r too many slip ups,we may be hearin the producers on the boxset talkin about how they hated the episode like Thirst :lol:

[Comic Geek]

Originally posted by Liriel
But it does obligate you to tell a friend that the person they are dating in committing horrific criminal acts, especially given what Lana already knew of Victor and what was done to him. If Lana chose to get involved after then so be it. I just can't see any way that a good friend can not tell, when they haven't already made some promise to someone else to keep it.


I blame Lex for Lex's actions, and Lana for Lana's. And Clark and Chloe for theirs. They did not try to tell her how dangerous the person she was getting involved with was, and then Chloe even kind of encouraged Lana to go for it.

The problem with them teling Lana about Lex is that she won't listen. I've been through this with my own friends, and not only won't they listen, but they quit talking to you. Sometimes, the only thing you can do is keep your mouth shut and pray for them. At least, that way, when things fall apart , you'll still be there to help them pick up the pieces.